Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Books I read in April


Lacklustre month reading-wise and in so many other ways. The lustreless nature of this post reflects this.

Saga, Vol. 1, Brian K. Vaughan & Fiona Staples. My interest in comics has waned over the past couple of years, but I had to have a look at Saga, given half of my Twitter feed spontaneously orgasms every time a new issue is published. I'm glad I did, as Saga is an extremely smart and funny sf saga. (That's about the limit of my verbal playfulness just now, sorry.) The initial six issues do a masterful job of establishing the setting and characters, and the story is gripping from the first frame. Which, incidentally, features a close-up of a major character grimacing and saying "Am I shitting? It feels like I'm shitting." If you find that kind of talk amusing, or at least intriguing - why is she shitting, if shitting she be? - then read on...

A Storm of Swords: Blood and Gold, George R.R. Martin. Loses none of the preceding volume's vitality (see my review in last month's round-up), indeed  bests it by drawing various storylines together or to an apparent close. Which is to say, lots of characters die, suffer unexpected twists of fate, and/or have various indignities forced upon them by their gleefully unsentimental creator. As a whole, A Storm of Swords is the best of the first three ASOIAF novels by a Westeros mile . (Westeros mile = the distance the average citizen of said land can walk without chancing upon brigands, having a limb hacked off, being drawn into a web of aristocratic intrigue, or having his or her surprisingly-well-sculpted and always hairless arse exposed to the world. So, about twenty of our Earth metres.)

Pobby and Dingan, Ben Rice. Charming novella set on the Lightning Ridge opal fields. Narrator Ashmol is the cocksure son of a miner; his sister Kellyanne is a more fragile child, devoted to her imaginary friends, Pobby and Dingan. When the fantastic duo go missing and Kellyanne becomes ill, Ashmol sets out to "find" the missing friends, in the process drawing the entire town into Kellyanne's fantasy.

Meditations on the importance of make-believe can tend towards the twee, but Pobby and Dingan is grounded by Ashmol's pragmatism and resourcefulness. His voice is wonderfully realised, even if the ockerisms are sometimes laid on a bit thick, and there is the occasional misstep - for instance, I doubt Ashmol would say "ass" instead of "arse". The pacing is perfect, building to a affecting, bittersweet climax. Pobby and Dingan is 90 pages of reading bliss.

My edition features a second novella, Specks In the Sky. This one reminded me of Magnus Mills in its straight-faced absurdity and lurking darkness. Again the teenaged narrator is brilliantly rendered.

Friday, April 26, 2013

Cranks

Pinknantucket Press has published Crank, a magazine in which contributors "can air petty annoyances, obscure conspiracy theories and general arguments about what is wrong with the world." It's like a letters-to-the-editor page with better literary values, or that guy on the bus reading MX and lecturing the other passengers about why this city/country/species is stuffed, in convenient magazine format. Crank is available at the Pinknantucket Press site for $5 (hard copy + digital) or 99c for digital only. That's a lot of spittle for your buck!

Last Friday I hurt my lower back and spent the next few days hobbling around downing Panadeine and Nurofen Plus. The upside was that I got to watch a lot of movies: Young Frankenstein, No Country For Old Men, The Wicker Man (original of course), and something else I can't remember just now, all of which I have seen before and love, even The Wicker Man which is not an especially well-made film aside from the classic denouement and the bit where Britt Ekland dances around naked, which really drives home the film's pagan/Christian-carnal/puritanical binaries and also she has a really nice bum. Anna and I watched Wake In Fright, which was more horrific than I had ever imagined. It really is an extraordinary, savage, misanthropic, hilarious, queasy, gorgeous film.

The other two films I watched were Kick-Ass and Crank. Kick-Ass is yet another "deconstruction" of the superhero mythos, raising questions like: What if a real, average person without superpowers or stacks of cash tried to be a superhero? What if we explore the damaged psyches behind the superheroic facade? What if superheros are actually fascists imposing order on an acquiescent society? What if superheros really got hurt like really real people really do? You know, the same fucking questions that have been raised in every second superhero comic and movie in the past 30 years.

Kick-Ass brings no original insights to these matters, preferring to wallow in a swamp of self-congratulatory meta-humour and homophobia. Far from showing the "real life" consequences of comic book violence, the film revels in it, wagging it's finger at the audience with one hand while jerking to a sexualised 11yo heroine cutting baddies' throats with the other. I'd have preferred Kick-Ass to be completely amoral, to own its bloodlust, but the filmmakers want to have it both ways. Dumb entertainment has no intelligence threshold, but smart-dumb entertainment requires wit and self-awareness. Kick-Ass has neither.

Crank, otoh, is unapologetically dumb but it is smart about it. Jason Statham stars as a hitman who has been injected with a poison that will kill him unless he keeps his adrenalin pumping. The concept itself is genius, a biological twist on the classic 90s thriller The Bus That Couldn't Slow Down. Statham has to try to find the guy who poisoned him while keeping his adrenalin levels up, which involves constantly running and fighting and driving fast and having sex with his girlfriend in public and just generally behaving like a maniac. And it is AWESOME, at least until it bogs down slightly in the last half hour, but until then it's non-stop inventive action, filmed and edited in appropriately hyperactive style. As various people have pointed out, Crank is basically a 90-minute action sequence, with the aesthetics - and character depth - of a wild and nasty video game. It's dumb done right: committed, inventive, and crazy entertaining.

Apparently the sequel - in which Statham is fitted with an electronic heart and must dash around town while periodically administering electric shocks to his own chest - is even more ridiculous. Screw the superhero deconstruction: bring on the high-concept dumb.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Pontypool

Zombies as a cultural trope jumped the shark and ate its innards several years ago, but every so often something refreshing lurches out of the night and grabs at you with its ragged, bloodied fingertips. Max Brooks's World War Z is a good example: a well thought out, impeccably crafted "oral history" of a zombie apocalypse, with enough awesome scenarios to put dozens of shitty zombie flicks, comics, and novels to shame.

On a smaller scale, the 2009 Canadian film Pontypool takes the familiar zombie movie cliches and plays with them - turns them over, tickles their belly, then vomits blood in their slavering faces. The action takes place almost entirely inside a radio studio in the eponymous rural town where Grant Mazzy, a big-time shock jock demoted to the minor leagues, his producer and her assistant are broadcasting their homely morning show when strange reports start to filter in. Rampaging mobs have been seen marauding local businesses; later it transpires that the crowds are babbling a kind of word salad, and may be cannibalising their victims. The French Canadian military is rumoured to have mobilised. (That it's the French Canadian military turns out to be significant, and points to the film's relatively subtle political subtext.) Meanwhile, the production assistant has started to stammer and repeat herself in a most disturbing manner...

The first hour of Pontypool is some of the finest suspense I've encountered in a long time. The witty script, minimal set - a converted church that feels simultaneously cavernous and claustrophobic - and a trio of committed performances deserve credit. But it is the intricate sound design that drives the mounting terror. Sound - specifically language - is the means of transmission of this particular plague, and director Bruce McDonald embeds the complexities of communication, verbal and non-verbal, in every level of the film.

The tension dissipates somewhat in the final half hour, as the threat becomes more palpable and the script forsakes wry banter for a semiotics lecture, but there's enough going on to keep it enjoyable. If, like me, you're bored with zombies, or you just want to see a good low-budget thriller, Pontypool is highly recommended.

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Iain Banks

Yesterday Iain Banks issued a statement announcing that he has terminal cancer and is unlikely to live longer than a year. His forthcoming book, The Quarry (a "non-M" novel), will be his last.

This news has come as a shock to Banks's many fans, myself among them. Banks is only 59, and has always come across as youthful and energetic. It's difficult to imagine someone of such vitality being so suddenly stricken and on the verge of death. This is one of the possible fates that awaits us all, of course, but it never gets any easier to confront.

Unable to sleep last night, I scrolled through the #IainBanks and #IainMBanks feeds on Twitter. (There was also, inevitably, an #IanBanks tag, for Banks's less literate fans.) Commemorating the dead and dying is a venerable and not always tasteful Twitter tradition, but the tributes to Banks were in the main heartfelt and sorrowful. Banks is much-loved, not only for his work, but for his enthusiastic, generous and down-to-earth personality. Few people can afford a collection of flash sports cars (later sold due to environmental concerns) and still seem like the kind of person you can imagine having a quiet drink with.

Banks was vital to me as a budding reader. I came to The Wasp Factory via my teenage interest in horror fiction and went from there. His early non-M books were extraordinary, mind-expanding works, drawing from Kafka and Peake, as well as genre conventions and contemporary literary realism. When I got to the sf - published under the name Iain M. Banks to differentiate it from his more "mainstream", but often sf/fantasy-inflected novels - they knocked me sideways.

Epic, intricate, combining intellectual invention with vivid characters and bravura action, Banks's sf took the tropes of classic space opera and made them utterly contemporary. As Mike put it on Twitter last night, "it was like being given back a whole genre that I'd abandoned." Banks's major sf sequence, set amid and on various fringes of the vast Culture civilisation, was his vision of a (in his words) "secular utopia", but it was never an idealised fantasy. For all the technological wonders of the Culture universe, Banks was always concerned with the ambiguities of human character and the shifting allegiances of realpolitik. The novels were all formally different, too, from the widescreen epic of Consider Phlebas to the comedy of manners of Look to Windward via the fantasy world of Inversions and the harder-edged adventure of Excession and Use of Weapons.*

A writer producing a novel a year is inevitably going to have fallow patches. By 1999's The Business, the non-M books were starting to feel careless and half-hearted. The last one I read was the disappointing post-9/11 story Dead Air. I'm a couple of M books behind, but the last one I read, 2008's Matter, showed Banks continuing to explore new aspects of the Culture universe, and stretching his storytelling skills. Fans were divided, as fans always are, but to me it indicated that Banks still had plenty left in the tank. I'm looking forward to catching up with the two further Culture novels that followed.

It always feels a bit strange eulogising someone you've never met - in this case, someone who is not even dead yet! Yet it would be stranger to simply shrug it off, as if a personal relationship were the only possible source of meaning in life. The connections forged through art are as profound as any other, and can transcend time and space. When someone's work has been as formative as Banks's has been to me, it is impossible not to feel a personal link with that person, however intangible. I feel terrible for Banks, and for his family. I feel sorrow for what he must be enduring, and what he must face. I also feel gratitude for the hours I have spent reading and thinking about his wonderful work. Thanks, Iain.

"My gratitude extends beyond the limits of my capacity to express it." (The Player of Games)

*For those new to Banks who are put off by the length of the Culture series, fear not: the books can be read in any order, with only Look to Windward and Surface Detail considered quasi-sequels to earlier work. (Consider Phlebas and Use of Weapons, respectively.) Even then, the connections tend to be thematic rather than narrative. Banks also wrote a number of stand-alone sf novels; Feersum Endjinn is generally regarded as the best of these.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Books I read in March

The not many books I read this month + Anna.
Misadventures, Sylvia Smith. A collection of autobiographical vignettes by a superficially unremarkable woman who, in her 50s, decided she would quite like to write a book.

To say Smith's prose is unaffected would be an understatement. Hers is the turgid "then this happened, and then..." style of the family Christmas letter, the postcard from a slightly dull friend, the daily Facebook update by that guy you used to work with who keeps posting "hilarious" stories about his kids. It is undistinguished, even amateurish, and the stories themselves often lack a discernible structure, or, indeed, a point.

Yet Misadventures has a cumulative effect. Smith worked a variety of jobs, mostly administrative, never married, and carried on an active social life. So, for one thing, Misadventures is an account of small but often important moments in a single, working woman's life in the mid-to-late 20th century. But the appeal of the book is more than anthropological. There is a fascinating ordinariness to the events Smith describes. These are minor triumphs, sadnesses, scares; moments of humour and kindness. Smith lived a relatively circumscribed life, but not an unpleasant one. Misadventures takes us into her world of social clubs, tour groups, dances, country pubs, rambles, boyfriends, lodging houses. Smith's prose, which at first feels so wooden, begins to seem like the perfect vehicle for her doggedly unglamourous tales.

Halfway through reading Misadventures, I googled Smith to find out if she had written anything else. Turns out there are two further books, My Holidays and Appleby House. It also turned out that she had died in late February, aged 67. Via a couple of rather snide newspaper obits, I learned that Misadventures was widely panned upon publication. This is not surprising, given Smith's naive lack of "literary-ness". But it does raise some questions. Must literature contain, even privilege  introspection? What is the value of the mundane? Can the mundane only transmute into art when filtered through a more intellectual aesthetic, (eg Nicholson Baker)? Does the writer's gender matter when it comes to reporting on the mundane? What is a "significant" subject for memoir? Is it possible to achieve literary effects only if one is "well read" and part of a dominant literary culture? Are the accidental or incidental effects of the "amateur" as valuable as those achieved by "professionals"? What does it mean when a book such as Misadventures connects with a broad range of readers, despite lacking the obvious trappings of "good" writing? Could I use any more scare quotes in this paragraph?

Your answers on the back of a copy of Amazing Spiderman #1, please.

Whatever the broader questions raised by the production, publication and reception of Misadventures, the book works as a warm and charming memoir. It's probably a bit of a love it or hate it proposition, and that in itself is all to the good. Oh, here is Dan Rhodes's lovely post on the late Ms. Smith, may she rest in peace.

A Storm of Swords: Steel and Snow, George R.R. Martin. The first volume of the third book of A Song of Ice and Fire is a 600pp behemoth in its own right. I loved the first two books, but GRRM is really revved up here. I'm not sure I have ever read a novel in which so much shit has gone down. Every chapter brings unexpected twists of fate, and at least two chapters ended with me shaking my head and whispering, "Oh. Fuck me."

If you're into this series, you don't need me to tell you to read this, and indeed you probably did so years ago. If you're not into it, or only know the tv show, I want to impress upon you how brilliant and thrilling this work is. The fantasy setting is so detailed, yet the complexity is immersive rather than overwhelming. Martin has built the world before our eyes, and even now, three books in, he's adding details that incrementally flesh out our understanding of its geography, history, and peoples. Martin's does this without info-dumping, without dry appendices. Everything that he wants you to know is in the text, and it works to build a world rich in character, story and thematic resonance.

Because the narrative flits between a range of p.o.v. characters, many of the chapters resemble short stories into which the reader is dropped, disoriented, and which then build to often nerve-wracking crescendoes. Critics tend to focus on the ASOIAF books' conceptual scope and ever-increasing length, overlooking  Martin's brilliance at writing powerful individual scenes or passages. A chapter like the one in which Samwell Tarly flees the Others (later used as the basis for the best episode of The Biggest Loser evah!), demonstrates Martin's extraordinary ability to tell a compressed, structurally complex narrative.

Another pejorative leveled at Martin - sometimes even by ostensible fans - is that he is writing "pulp". Divorced from its historical context, I assume this is intended to mean cheap, disposable  workmanlike. I can understand criticism of Martin's occasionally idiosyncratic grammar and word-choice, as well as his more lascivious descriptions of nudity and sex, but he is not a "cheap" or careless writer. In fact, his prose is usually supple and direct. I'm now over 2500 pages into the saga, and I have noticed very little obvious repetition of figurative language. (The characters' repetition of homilies and mottos is a different matter, being deliberate and of a piece with the world depicted.) Even the infamous epithet that attaches to Jon Snow isn't as prevalent here as in the tv series. (Although that might only seem to be the case because we encounter him every few chapters, rather than every few minutes.) Even the much-derided longuers involving supposedly endless descriptions of meals or sigils feel well-honed, and there are far fewer of these moments than comment thread wits would have you believe. Anyway, I quite enjoy them.

Sure, there are flaws: the occasional flat scene or chapter, moments of coincidence that challenge belief. There is also the ongoing issue of Martin's apparent preoccupation with incest and his sometimes dubious approach to secondary women characters - in marked contrast to his array of excellent leading women. But overall I was enthralled by this book, and I'm looking forward to reading the closing volume and the remaining two books in the series to date.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Books I read in February (Part two)



(Part one is here, yo.)

Strangers on a Train, Patricia Highsmith. I thought I knew the plot from the movie, but it turns out to have been so long since I saw it that all I could remember was that it involved some strangers on, like, a train. Every other preconceived notion I had about the book was completely wrong, which was a pleasant surprise, given the thing's a suspense thriller.

The set-up is a slow burn, and the way it plays out is clever, with ample attention given to the existential nature of the crimes. It is very much a psychological thriller: the fracturing of the protagonist's mental states is as important to the suspense as their physical crimes. Highsmith's omniscient narration is pretty clunky, with the action proceeding mainly via descriptions of actions, thoughts, and mental states. This to some extent undermines Highsmith's efforts to absorb us into the psyches of her wascally cwiminals.

Even still, I enjoyed the sick fascination that Strangers on a Train evoked. Awful people doing awful things: that's entertainment.

Varying Degrees of Hopelessness, Lucy Ellmann. Ellmann's second novel is rather slight compared to her latter-day marvel Dot In the Universe, but it delivers enough wit, sex, and dark jabs at humanity to be worthwhile. Set in an obscure London art school, Varying Degrees follows the amorous fortunes of the virginal, delusional Isabel, and her horny belly-dancing roommate Pol. It's fairly insubstantial, but there is pleasure to be had. Ellmann is frank and funny, and demonstrates a B.S. Johnsonian delight at messing with the trappings of realism.

Thunder and Lightnings, Jan Mark. Another much-loved book from my late childhood. I first read this in Grade 5, having selected it from the small library my teacher maintained in our classroom. I was obsessed with fighter planes, so a novel about a boy obsessed with fighter planes was always going to appeal.

The story is simple. Andrew moves to the country with his parents and falls in with Victor, resident weird kid and devotee of the soon-to-be-obsolete supersonic jet fighter, the English Electric Lightning. In the manner of all such tales of friendship, the two boys complement one another, each turning out to be just what the other needed to expand his horizons as adolescence approaches.

Thunder and Lightnings is a lovely novel, full of the warmth and combativeness of pre-pubescent friendship. It is gentle, not only in style, but also in spirit.

Marry Me, Dan Rhodes. Rhodes's books always end up with cheesy, cartoonish covers, implicit recognition of his strange position in contemporary literature. Too charming and romantic to be feted as a purveyor of Serious Literature, too willing to rub genre the wrong way and make off-colour jokes to have broad mainstream appeal, Rhodes is perhaps the only writer on the planet whose books can carry approving quotations from Jenny Colgan and Stewart Lee.

Marry Me is the follow-up to Rhodes's first book, Anthropology. That book collected 101 love stories, each clocking in at 101 words. This one is less strict in a structural sense - there's seventy or eighty stories of varying lengths - and focuses on the various facets of marriage: the proposals, ceremonies, compromises, and disappointments. A few of the stories are poignant, but for the most part Rhodes goes for laughs and a kind of uneasy irony.

This is a short book - I read it on a Sunday afternoon without having to get up and freshen my drink - but an enjoyable one. Rhodes is brilliant at the difficult short-short form, and he can be very funny - even Marry Me's epigraph page made me laugh.

Man or Mango?, Lucy Ellmann. Ellmann tickles me just so, but while I laughed and gasped and shook my head wonderingly at various times reading Man or Mango?, on the whole it left me perplexed. This is Ellman's third book, and it strikes me as an important one in her corpus. (If I can be permitted such an assertion, having only read three of her books.) (Man I love the word "corpus".) Whereas Varying Degrees of Hopelessness was slight and occasionally tentative, Man or Mango? marks the point at which Ellmann became more or less completely unmoored from the conventions of literary fiction as she is practised. And thank god for that, frankly. There's nothing here resembling traditional "character development", the narrative mode shifts constantly, and Ellmann throws in all manner of stylistic parody and quotation (attributed and otherwise). As for story, well, is there one? Yet Ellmann's gift for combining invective and agonisingly blunt assessments of the human condition kept me turning the pages. And yet, the novel doesn't gel. Unlike Dot in the Universe, which refines the techniques developed here, Man or Mango? is loose and directionless. Yet - don't mind me, I'm transforming into a yeti - I can't dislike a novel that contains passages such as this:

"Everything is so vivid to a child. They're receptive because they're ignorant: they have no idea what a great swindle is in store for them. This is why their smiles move us so. (But it's the smiles of adults that should move us. How can they smile?)"

Misanthropes, represent!

Monday, February 25, 2013

Books I read in February (Part one)


Dot In the Universe, Lucy Ellmann. The cover looks like a parody of a moron's idea of a parody of the "chicklit" aesthetic, but the novel itself is pure, raging satire. Ellmann writes with rare passion, dotting (heh) the pages with shouty caps. This might have gotten old fast, but the little old lady who lives in a shoe in my brain who is responsible for reading the books I put in front of my eyes quickly assimilated the technique. Besides, it fits perfectly with Ellmann's authorial persona, which is as forthright and unshrinking as a bayonet charge.

Ellmann writes with bracing anger. Her target: humanity in general. We are meatbags of folly, our achievements as nothing compared to our innate awfulness. "Love, like defecation, is never a settled matter," the narrator confides early on, which gives some idea of Ellmann's cynicism, and her Swiftian bluntness when it comes to bodily functions. Later: "Having children is always a mistake, leading to destruction and dismay..." The novel is dotted (ha) with such misanthropic epigrams. Sometimes Ellmann abandons irony in favour of a battering ram. One chapter is titled, simply, "FUCK SCIENCE", and it is as thrilling and disturbing and (I guess maybe) wrong-headed as it sounds.

Ellmann has a genius for invective, yet she demonstrates a Vonnegutian compassion for the poor species she lambasts. There is a sense that anything goes here - very few books outside of late Thomas Hardy feature a protagonist who is reincarnated as a possum, complete with photos - but Ellmann is also profoundly moral. Ultimately, for all its deliberate and often amusing ugliness I found this a cathartic, strangely touching novel.

Survival, Russell Evans. Political prisoner Ivanov escapes from the gulag, trudges across the tundra, mile after mile, holes up for winter in a cave, and eats a lot of really foul-sounding meatballs in this stirring against-the-odds thriller with anti-authoritarian undertones.

I first encountered this Puffin Plus in 1991 in Mrs Murray's Year 7 English class. It made a big impression on me, marking one of the very few times I enjoyed reading a set text for high school. I've thought of it occasionally in recent years, but I couldn't remember the author's name, nor if the book was called Survival, Survivor, or something else entirely. Needless to say it proved ungoogleable.

Then, a few weeks ago, Anna turned up a copy in a second-hand bookstore in Camberwell. Same edition I read all those years ago, with the same stupid cover illustration. (In the story, Ivanov is described as being in his twenties, with a "boyish face". Obviously one has to factor in his ordeal, but even a year living rough on the taiga would scarcely be enough to turn the fresh-faced Ivanov into the ravaged, Joaquin Phoenix-circa-2009 figure depicted on the cover.)

Reading it now, I appreciated Evans's concise storytelling. No sooner has the idea of escape been planted in Ivanov's mind than he has jumped the wire and begun his adventure. The bulk of the book is taken up with his year or so on the run, hunting, fishing, freezing, and generally acting like a Soviet-era Bear Grylls minus the rampant testicle-consumption. I found this stuff riveting, with the ever-resourceful Ivanov using guile and intelligence to survive.

The last few chapters, in which Ivanov returns to the world of men, provide some delicious twists and not a few digs at (the author's idea of) the Soviet mindset. It could be irksome in its neatness, but Evans handles it well, and frankly by this point I was so pleased for Ivanov that I was willing to indulge Evans's contrivances.

Going by his rambunctious (and presumably self-penned) bio, Evans seems like a larger than life figure, having done all sorts of odd and dangerous things before settling down to write this Cold War parable for teenagers. I haven't been able to find any information about him online, nor have I found another review of this excellent book. Given he fought in the Spanish Civil War, I assume he was getting on in 1979, the year Survival was published. I'd love to know whether he published anything else.

Artful, Ali Smith. If you've seen, or read (seeing is better), Ali Smith's 2012 lecture on style vs content, you'll know that her lectures do not unfold in a measured style. "A man's gotta have enthusiasms," declares Al Capone before smashing an underling's head with a baseball bat in De Palma's The Untouchables, and that seems to be the underlying philosophy behind Smith's lectures. (The enthusiasms, not the battering of skulls.) She's all over the shop, but, as a writer of not a little skill and standing, she engagingly imparts a vivid sense of her aesthetic.

Artful collects four lectures Smith gave at St Anne's College, Oxford, in 2012. The speeches are typically diffuse, but Smith has made the unusual decision to tie them together with a fictional framework in which the narrator - the partner of a recently-deceased academic/writer - reads and reflects upon the speeches. (Which are here attributed to the dead woman, rather than Smith herself.) This creates a shifting counterpoint that allows Smith to reflect on, even debate, her own ideas.

Sadly, the lectures rarely come alive on the page, and they are so scattershot that it is difficult to find a thread to latch onto. I had feared that the fiction portions would be even less appealing, but I warmed to the narrator and enjoyed the way her thoughts developed the ideas found in the lectures. Artful is a bold experiment, offering frequent moments of insight and the pleasure of Smith's company, but it's also a bit of a mess.

Grinny, Nicholas Fisk. While reading Survival, I kept thinking about this book, another formative experience from around the same period. Well do I remember the dread that crept through my entrails every time Mrs Campbell, my Grade Six teacher, announced that she planned to finish up the school day with a "treat" - another chapter from Grinny. I was a sensitive lad, already terrified of aliens - also clouds, lambs, dogs with eyebrows - and the prospect of an unidentified flying objectionable infiltrating my comfortable suburban household in the guise of a kindly old lady was... Well, just look at the cover.

Reading it now, I didn't find Grinny especially scary. I've been through parenthood, relationship breakdowns, and one time I saw an entire episode of The Block - having known true terror, what's a little alien invasion action to me? Still, I experienced chills when I hit scenes that had frightened me as a lad. I say "scenes", but I was frightened of more or less everything that happened in the last 80 pages, and the book is only 90 pages long.

With great concision, Fisk builds a credible world, and brings it under increasingly sinister threat. His young protagonists are imbued with intelligence; also, just as crucially, emotions. Mat sums it up well in his reviewGrinny "is a slow-burning, tense and eventually explosive parable about the powerful anger of children under threat."

So, in many ways, Grinny remains a terrific book. Unfortunately, it is one of the most insistently sexist novels I have ever read. Dated language is to be expected from a novel published in 1973, but the anti-woman agenda expressed here is pathological. Barely a page goes by without the pubescent narrator directing a jibe or two at women for their (I quote) "built-in bitchiness". I'm glad I revisited Grinny, but I won't be rushing to press it into my kids' hands.

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Books I read in January


At Swim-Two Birds, Flann O'Brien. I have resolved to write something about every book I read this year. It may end up being a plot synopsis, or a sestina, or simply the words "I done read a berk!" I'm making no promises of coherence or insight.

Anyway, the first book I read in 2013 was Flann O'Brien's comic extravaganza, At Swim-Two Birds. The narrator is a slightly pompous university student who spends his days avoiding his dour uncle and composing a novel, of sorts, about an author named John Trellis who forces his characters - variously drawn from Irish myth and penny dreadfuls - to live with him. The characters end up drugging Trellis in order to gain their freedom, and hilarity ensues, just as Newton's Third Law of Hilarity states that it must.

And look, it's very funny a lot of the time. There are longueurs, especially the bits drawn from mythology, which perfectly synthesise the standard myth-telling tone, right down to being kind of boring. The joy of the book is its virtuosic bullshitting conversations, in the course of which O'Brien skewers everything from literary convention (c. 1939) to the shit your da' says.

Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn. A librarian pressed this into my hands, with the promise that it was the current big thing. Later I learned that it was the most-reviewed book on Goodreads for 2012. Last week I rescued a ringtail possum that had fallen into the Darebin Creek. Granted the power of speech by a mischievous discardedsyringesprite, he foretold that I would read Gone Girl while holidaying on the Great Ocean Road, and write about it here.

And lo it came to pass. Gone Girl is a super-slick thriller, machined to provoke and enthral by a provocative enthralling machine going by the unlikely name of Gillian. It's hard to give any kind of synopsis, because this kind of novel relies on drip-feeding you revelations, page by page, chapter by chapter, all the way to the end. I can safely say it's about a woman who disappears one day, and the husband she leaves behind. The rest you'll have to discover yourself, possibly in the inevitable movie adaptation starring - I don't know - Channing Tatum and whoever has the dubious fortune to be the female version of Channing Tatum. (Not Stockard Channing. That would be confusing.)

I'm not sure that I actually enjoyed this book. It is, as I've attempted to suggest above, very well done. There's no faulting Flynn's professionalism: she had me turning the pages well into the night, just as she's s'posed to. But I don't know. It was a little too perfectly honed for my taste, the twists - none of which are especially shocking - doled out too meticulously. The other problem I had is with the narrative form, which leans heavily upon competing first-person narrators, a conceit that becomes increasingly contrived. As with everything else here, Flynn does it as well as it can be done, but if I want to watch clockwork I'll look at a clock. YMMV.

The Beauty Queen of Leenane and Other Plays, Martin McDonagh. Loose trilogy of short plays by the writer-director of the wonderful In Bruges and the messy but occasionally inspired Seven Psychopaths. The characters (drunkards, thugs, harridans) and settings (run-down shacks furnished with the meagre trappings of grinding poverty) reminded me of the venerable Synge and O'Casey plays I encountered studying Irish lit at uni, which I gather is partly the point. As in his films, McDonagh works with and against stereotypes, creating a subtle push-pull of knowingness and sincerity. The rural Galway of these plays is bleak and dull, filled with conniving drunkards whose recourse to violence is frequent. Somehow, though, McDonagh allows his characters enough humanity to provide moments of real emotional resonance. Oh, and the dialogue is often piss-funny, so it be.

The Last Samurai, Helen DeWitt. Genius is a difficult quality to depict. In movies it's usually done by having the genius character do a lot of blackboard work while ancillary characters watch with quiet awe, thus affirming the genius's genius for we plebs in the audience. Writing genius is much harder, and is probably best left to genius writers or at least the very smart. I mean, anyone could write about a genius, but it's something else to actually write a genius from the inside out.

In The Last Samurai, Helen DeWitt writes two geniuses. The first is Sybilla, a single mother with a compulsive, acquisitive personality, and a talent for languages. The second is her son, Ludovic, a child prodigy whom Sybilla believes could be the next Newton or Einstein.

The first half of the book is told mostly from Sybilla's p.o.v., as she attempts to educate the infant Ludo, while working a thankless typing job, and pursuing her own intellectual interests. The narration reflects Sybilla's eccentric, free-wheeling approach to life, love and pedagogy, the pages alive with idiosyncratic punctuation, capitalisation, bits of Homeric Greek and Japanese and mathematical formulae. Exhilarating and exhausting, it places the reader inside the experience of genius, and the special demands that a child prodigy places on even the most intelligent and resourceful parent.

The second half is slightly more conventional. Ludo, now eleven, goes in search of his father, "auditioning" various notable men for the role. His encounters with these men are funny and moving, and the juxtaposition of Ludo's rational, measured intellect with his mother's more rambunctious style creates warm drama amidst all the cleverness. The Last Samurai is an odd, wonderful book. I can't think of anything quite like it.

The Pillowman, Martin McDonagh. A writer of gory fairy tales is arrested by the secret police in a totalitarian state, accused of a series of child murders. What follows is by turns hilarious and tragic. It's essentially an exploration of storytelling - its responsibilities, meanings, purposes, and distortions - but there is nothing didactic about it. Instead it is a twisting, turning, razor-toothed monster of a play, impossible to pin down, and impossible to stop reading. As far as can be determined from simply reading the play, McDonagh's approach to stagecraft is far more sophisticated here than in his earlier work. Even on the page The Pillowman is a brilliant, urgent work.

The Accidental, Ali Smith. This is a tough one to synopsify. The set-up, consciously cribbed from Pasolini's Teorema, has a mysterious stranger ingratiate herself into a troubled family holidaying on the Norfolk coast. The stranger acts as a catalyst, shaking up the family as individuals and as a group.

So, that sounds contrived and dull. But what a synopsis - even a good synopsis, as opposed to my effort - can't intimate is Smith's dexterous free indirect narration, the way she successfully delineates and animates her quintet of protagonists. The Accidental is also deliberately of its time: set in 2003, it takes in the Iraq war, Abu Graihb, internet porn, cyber bullying - but there is little if any Amis-esque "state of the nation" posturing. Full marks, too, for not capitalising the word "internet". That, as Devo said, really gets my goat.

I first read this on publication in 2005 (and wrote about it here). Somehow I never got around to reading more Ali Smith. The time has come to rectify this.

Girl Meets Boy, Ali Smith. Smith twists the myth of Iphis into a warm and witty romantic satire about boys who like girls who do boys like they're girls who do etc. Part of the Canongate Myths series, this is a light and airy novella with intimations of weightier themes.

Monday, January 21, 2013

The new drug

The new drug has a name like an affordable Korean two-door hatchback.

The new drug is new to doctors, new to patients. Now, new to me.

The new drug is the fourth new drug in 28 months. So many swallows has not a summer made.

The new drug has "a good side-effect profile"; HOWEVER, the new drug may, in some cases, cause the exact symptoms it is intended to combat.

The new drug has a shiny yellow box. Yellow is the colour of sunshine, of cowardliness, of jaundice.

The new drug may work for a while, then stop. The new drug may not work at all. The new drug may work wonders.

(Here's a not-very-well-kept secret: nobody fucking really knows what the fuck any of these fucking drugs will fucking do.)

The new drug is an enigma. The old disease is an enigma. It is hoped that the enigmas will somehow align, and solve each other.

The new drug is the future.

The new drug. The new drug. The new drug.

Apparently this is my life now.

Thursday, December 27, 2012

My favourite albums of 2012.

Top Seven

Actress, RIP
Daphni, Jiaolong
Flying Lotus, Until the Quiet Comes
Four Tet, Pink
Quakers, s/t
Shackleton, Music For the Quiet Hour/The Drawbar Organ EPs
Adrian Sherwood, Survival & Resistance

Other favourites

Blondes, s/t
Cooly G, Playin' Me
The Coup, Sorry to Bother You
El-P, Cancer 4 Cure
Future of the Left, The Plot Against Common Sense
Dave Graney & the Mistly, You've Been In My Mind
Grimes, Visions
Himanshu, Nehru Jackets
Oliver Huntemann, Paranoia
Schoolboy Q, Habits & Contradictions
Silent Servant, Negative Fascination
Shed, The Killer
John Talabot, fin